Monday, August 30, 2010

The R-Word

So, as Americans and those of us foreigners with morbid fascinations are aware, that loveable scamp Glenn Beck held his “restoring honor” rally in an attempt to “reclaim” the civil rights movement from those perky liberals who somehow got into their heads that Dr. King cared about things like economic equality and social justice. Now, plenty of people have picked apart this whole sordid affair a lot more eloquently than I could hope to, and it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to understand why it’s patently offensive for a man who decried Obama’s healthcare plan as a reparations scheme, playing off the fears of white Republicans that their money will go to BLACK PEOPLE, to attempt to co-opt the legacy of one of the Civil Rights Movement’s most important figures on the anniversary of his most famous speech. That isn’t what I want to talk about, though.


Everyone knows that there is no shortage of denialists when it comes to racism. They’re the folks, many of them not necessarily malicious people, who believe that racism ended so many years ago when that Martin Luther King guy they kinda learned about in high school talked about having a dream and racial inequality across the western world just vanished into thin air. They’re the folks who only see racism when it’s coming out of the mouth of a guy in a white hood whose family tree is a straight line, or a guy with a shaved head who’s perpetually unemployed because most employers don’t agree with him on how kickin’ rad his swastika facial tattoos are (though they are typically rightfully outraged about this type of racism). They claim to not even see race, because well shucks, if they noticed it than that would be more racist than anything! They’re the folks who cluelessly accuse people of color of oversensitivity when they comment that the Tea Party has a bit of racist streak. They are typically white, though every now and then you have a person of color who has “made it” (either through hard work, other social privileges, or a combination of the two) and thinks that dammit, if I could do it then every other person must be able to as well!


If some of that sounds a bit harsh, I apologize, because I don’t think that most of the people in this category are bad people. They absolutely are misguided, and the denial of racism is the biggest reason that it is able to continue and grow. However, even as a person of color myself, it’s hard to hold much of a grudge against them personally when they’re buying into the depressingly common and incorrect notions about racism that are continuously repeated and held up to be correct (the colorblind one especially). That said, even if they aren’t all bad people, having a discussion with them regarding the continued existence of racism and privilege is still challenging. They’re essentially being told that their “common sense” view of race relations is entirely incorrect, and that they are privileged when many of them may feel that they have not lead a privileged life at all. So naturally, they tend to get very defensive and as anti-racists, we want to get past that.


So, if you’re someone who wants to maintain a system of white privilege, then you want to encourage white defensiveness and feed the notion that anti-racism is about attacking people for being white. So you go one step further than saying that people who complain about racism are just oversensitive; you tell people that they are the REAL racists. You take the term racist, and transform it into “the R-word”, a slur against white people. This does three things: the first is that it puts the person standing up to racism on the same level as the previously mentioned skinhead or KKK member. When you’re dealing with people who believe that this is the only form that racism takes, then you must be just as bad as them, and therefore someone worthy only being ignored at the least and scorned at the worst. Secondly, it appeals to the denialist’s sense of victimization. As I’ve mentioned, people tend to get defensive when you talk about racial privilege, either because they do not view themselves are privileged and assume that you are making light of their own hardships, or because they believe that you are suggesting they are somehow undeserving of their situation. Start telling people that the person talking to them about racism is the real racist, though, and you can add “hates you for being white” onto that list as well.


It is the third effect that is the most sinister, and it is that it silences and disempowers people of color. As a person of color, when I point out to a white person that something they have said or done is racially insensitive, ignorant, or just outright hateful, they have the choice of whether to listen to me, to dismiss me, or to declare me oversensitive. This is what white privilege is; the ability of a white person to ignore or heed the perspectives and feelings of people of color as they see fit. In spite of this, the ability to call out racism is the one way that we are able to defend ourselves if we find ourselves in a hostile environment. By turning this act of defense into an act of aggression, and turning the perpetrators of racism into victims, we are effectively vilified and silenced. Racist comments and thinking go unopposed, because to do so would make us the real racists. We cannot call it for what it is, because we must dare not use the “R-word”.


Glenn Beck’s rally was more than just metaphorically pissing on MLK’s grave, it was a celebration of this notion that anti-racists are the only true racists. It isn’t the first time this sentiment has reared its ugly head; the vilification of the NAACP during the Shirley Sherrod fiasco because of the laughter heard in her heavily edited speech also demonstrated it, and up here in the Great White North a letter to one of my city’s major newspapers decried the injustice of the “R-word” and was snarkily agreed with by the editorial board (also the inspiration for the title of this piece – guess racists can be good for something!).However, the celebration of that sentiment on such a large scale should be of great concern to anyone who’s even cared about racism in passing. If anti-racism is successfully vilified then we can expect not only to not progress when it comes to racism, but to go backwards. Let’s make sure the “R-word” is the one slur we’re willing to use.

6 comments:

  1. I have to respectfully disagree on one point- Anyone who is demonstrably racist, and is called on it, and denies it, is a bad person. At least the KKK is confident enough in their beliefs that they don't hedge- they're full on racist, and proud of it.

    Anyone who could have that internal struggle, knowing that their true beliefs are wrong and hurtful, and knowing that they need to deny it to save face- to have that struggle, but still let the hate come out anyways, and then deny it or justify it away by appeal to the mob- that person is a bad person.

    They failed at one of the most basic morality tests everyone struggles with. We're all hard-wired to fear the unknown and unfamiliar. Giving into that fear, when you know it's wrong and hurtful, makes you a bad person. Blaming the mob behind you, or using its existence to justify your position of cowardice, is even worse.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wait a minute, A Mack, your concession to the KKK is that at least they're not wishy-washy about their VIOLENT, RACIST beliefs? Are you kidding? Are you arguing that a nazi is morally superior to a racism denier?

    There's something rotten about this logic you've presented.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The KKK and Nazis are marginalized, where they belong. The tea-party and anti-islam sentiment are not marginalized. I'd argue that there are many tea partiers just as racist as the average KKK member. The difference is that by hiding their racism, denying it's a factor in their decision making, the tea party gains viability through watering down of the True Ideology. The KKK are honest with the terms of the debate, and they are roundly rejected politically for it. The Tea Party is arguably just as racist by proxy of what their desired social policies would do to minority communities in America. They have viability, because they are all too cowardly to discuss openly how they really feel about the other.

    But I think we agree- they are all morally bankrupt. I guess I should have said that the tea party is more dangerous than the KKK, when I implied that the KKK had some perverse moral high ground. Point well taken.

    ReplyDelete
  4. A Mack,

    I understand what you're trying to get at, I don't think it's a good idea to write off everyone who gets defensive when confronted over their casual racism as irredeemable. Again, society promotes the idea that racism is dead and that true anti-racism comes from embracing the notion of colorblindness. That's some pretty heavy ingrained thinking we have to go against.

    There are some denialists who will dismiss every explanation given to them, and stay stuck in their sense of defensiveness. If they're going to be willfully ignorant like that, then by all means give em' hell, but I think it best to give people the benefit of the doubt and assume that they are decent people who need a bit of extra coaxing.

    ReplyDelete
  5. And yes, most people in the tea party would be considered willfully ignorant, if not barely disguised overt racists. From what I've seen there's not much chance of any reasonable discussion.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Aaron,

    I read this post and agreed with it, and decided not to comment simply because I had nothing to add. Your post summed it all up quite nicely.

    Until I had two interactions, over the past couple days. Both interactions were with white males who hold fairly progressive political ideologies. Both of these males became terrified/defensive/hostile and retreated behind ad hominem attacks when their racial conditioning was called out. Both interactions involved someone wanting a cookie because they were being an asshole but their intention (but not the effect of their words) was to be witty/clever and above all Not Racist/Not Bigoted. Both involved the demand to "grow a thicker skin"/"don't react angrily to the words I say!"

    I am so sick and tired of these interactions.

    One thing I have learned here is that when dealing with white, progressive racists, that the R-word is the one word they fear. It's the one word that has something of the stinging power as the slurs they level at oppressed groups. When the R-word is brought out in conversation, backpedaling, defensive derailing, and sniveling whining ensues. It's the one word that can cut through their magic invisible armor of privilege. Because they're so afraid of it here in the "great white north". They are terrified of the word.

    There's an old sketch where Richard Pryor and Chevy Chase hurl racial epithets at each other. Chase uses one racist slur after another at Pryor - but all Pryor yells at Chase is "Honky! Honky!" This is has been the case for a long time. We have lacked the words that hold that power - the power to silence; the power to ostracize; the power to instantly change the tone of a conversation or environment.

    Well in a "post-racial" America, we have the "r-word." And it works. It shocks people. It shames people. It is a word with power. We have a word in our arsenal that cuts through even the most coded subversive racism - "low-income/illegal immigrants/taking America back."

    You're absolutely right, Aaron. Let's not hesitate to use it. Use it wisely, and use it well, but no, we shouldn't be afraid to use it.

    My friend Lane Ackton said: "A supremacist of any ilk does not pause and gauge what the reactions to his/her words may be. A supremacist harms and continues to harm because doing so reinforces his/her privilege and perceived superiority by subjugating others. The only option is to ostracize a supremacist. Their behavior does not need to be understood or analyzed. Their behavior is holding us ALL back. And it needs to end."

    I feel like the R-word is exactly the tool to do this.

    ReplyDelete